Q&A: What is Nike’s responsibility in the Vick situation? How thoroughly do companies investigate spokesmen?
Question by Hopeful girl: What is Nike’s responsibility in the Vick situation? How thoroughly do companies investigate spokesmen?
I have read that Nike had a differently worded “morals” clause in their contract with Michael Vick. Did they word it differently because they had investigated him and knew there could be “issues” down the road? How thoroughly are potential spokesmen checked out before they sign to endorse a company’s products?
Any chance we could get Nike to take some of their Vick profits and make a huge donation to the ASPCA so something good can come from all those poor animals that suffered at the hands of Vick and his sick friends?
Hey guys, I know his endorsements are over—duh. But the company made a ton of money off him. And his moral clause was worded differently than most other clauses so I’m wondering what Nike knew about this if anything. Did they have information but chose to look the other way possibly? I’m just curious about that.
Best answer:
Answer by jakie
let vick go he kills 4 fun so did OJ simpson so y cant vick
Add your own answer in the comments!
Related posts:
- what is the size different for nike basketball shoes to nike sb dunk?
- What is the performance difference between these nike basketball shoes?
- Q&A: Whats the difference between Nike Nba Jerseys and Adidas?
- Q&A: nike???????????
- I heard of Nike refurbishing HighSchool tracks for a certain donaton of old shoes, what is this event?
